Today I applyed what I learned about problem-based learning (PBL), group learning, and student-centered pedagogies while I was on my Fulbright fellowship at Dublin Institute of Technology. I met the students in my second year architecture studio for the first time. Studio looked unlike Day One of this class (ARC201) ever looked before!
We started outside, with team building activities and a name game. Then we formed the teams (i.e., learning groups) that we’ll use for the first five weeks of this semester.
Next, we conducted initial site analysis in a way that was much more engaging than normal. We held a “scavenger hunt” to identify qualities of our project site (the Hampton University Point) that have to do with water. The students managed to generate a much more interesting list of factors than I’ve ever been able to get them to achieve before; 63 about water alone!
For Friday, each team (of three students) has two assignments due.
Assignment 1 is to draw a plan of our project site to an architectural scale to fill an 18″x24″ sheet of paper.
This problem prompt is pretty specific (close-ended), but it still leaves a number of variables for students to consider and make choices about. I hope they’ll get a bit competitive and prove they have pride in their work! I asked the groups to follow a standard PBL format in starting work on this assignment. I asked them to figure out:
- What is this assignment asking?
- What will we need to know to do this?
- What do we already know about this?
- What will we need to learn/find out?
- What resources will we need?
- Who will do what and when?
- How will we check for accuracy before it’s due?
Assignment 1 is more straightforward than you might expect for an architecture studio. However, it will lay groundwork for upcoming activities, and it will help me assess where the students are skills-wise and with regard to collaboration. The second assignment is much more open-ended.
Assignment 2 is to make a beautiful object that reveals the essence of water.
I asked the groups to start by watching one of the YouTube videos listed below, and assume that the astronaut/scientist had made the video in response to this assignment. I asked the students to consider the questions above (which are intended to foster “self-direcetd learning”) and to bring to our next studio meeting a final, beautiful object as well as at least three study models that investigating the “essence of water”. I’ve got my fingers crossed!
The students were more active, engaged, and enthusiastic about learning than is typical on Day One of this course and I have high hopes for this new method of teaching.
What a fun (and effective!) class!
So what resulted from “the essence of water?” Its got no flavor, no smell, no shape, and its invisible (right?). its like starting with nothing. did you publish these rsults?
I’d have to say, we’re still working in it. They’ve explored light, time, and water, but have farthest to come with understanding water.
In the meantime, blog writing has taken a backseat to grant writing. I hope to post more soon.
Thanks for your interest!