Sandra Cruz’s Award-Winning PhD Research Highlights

Scholarly, useful research is the name of the game in Europe!

These are the standards for research published in the European Journal of Engineering Education (EJEE), and they serve as a good guide for researchers in general.

This post sheds light on what makes a conference paper stand out. It shares the story of soon-to-be-Dr Sandra Ieri Cruz Moreno, who won the top research award from the European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI) in 2025.

SEFI’s special interest group on Engineering Education Research featured the work Sandra and I have done last week, in an online workshop, and the information is worth sharing more broadly — so here it is!

Workshop overview

Last week, Sandra (my PhD supervisee) and I presented this workshop as part of the SEFI@work learning series. We reported on one strand of Sandra’s PhD thesis research.

During the workshop, Sandra engaged the audience with questions about their own research to help transfer the successful part of our experience to the researchers who attended.

The workshop was great practice for Sandra’s viva voce (called a ‘dissertation defense’ in the USA), scheduled for March 10.

Unfortunately, vivas are closed-door events in Ireland. That means our colleagues can’t attend, so this online workshop was the main way to let our SEFI community know about the amazing work Sandra has done.

Research award

At the annual SEFI conference in Tampere, Finland, this past September, our paper Evolving gender dynamics in teamwork experiences among female engineering students in PBL settings was recognized with the sole “Best Research Paper” award.

I reported on the overall SEFI conference and my surprise and elation at winning this award in a September blogpost.

I accepted the award on Sandra’s behalf at SEFI 2025.

Now, the organizers of the online workshop asked us to share some secrets to our success. That was tricky!

SEFI advertised widely, and over 80 people registered to attend.

We hadn’t set out to win an award, just to make a scholarly summary of part of Sandra’s thesis study!

Although it felt intimidating to explain how to win, we went in with the confidence that the paper had been nominated in all three categories it was eligible for last year, and each category has a separate panel of judges.

We were beyond delighted — and completely surprised — to win.

It helped reassure us that the thesis research was ready to wrap up and report.

Workshop content

You can watch a video of the workshop, to hear in Sandra’s own words what is most interesting and valuable about her work and her research process:

And you’re able to download Sandra’s slides, to jump straight into the content, by clicking here:

One slide from Sandra’s presentation.

Sandra’s achievements

I couldn’t be prouder of Sandra and all she has accomplished in four short years. Since starting her doctoral studies in January 2022, she has delivered two babies into the world and developed an award-winning research study and a fully written thesis.

Sandra’s special contributions include introducing sociological techniques and perspectives into engineering education research. She has broadened the focus of our discourse on the usefulness and applicability of phenomenology as a research method, and she has shed valuable new light regarding the experiences of female students in our engineering courses at Technological University Dublin.

The findings of her PhD research hold applicability well beyond TU Dublin, however. They show us how the social dynamics of teamwork evolve over time — how students develop meaningful friendships that help them personally and professionally.

Sandra used the “Gender at Work” framework to better understand students’ experiences with Problem-Based Learning and other collaborative learning approaches. Using this framework, she found that the 22 women I’d interviewed (longitudinally over a period of four years):

  • had experienced uneven access to engineering content before entering university, 
  • lacked female engineers in their families who could serve as role models,
  • experienced some biased team dynamics that influenced what jobs got assigned to whom by the team, and that the need to prove themselves on teams grew less but nonetheless persisted across their four-year matriculation, and 
  • received increased recognition for their credibility over time, which helped them challenge stereotypes and shift team dynamics in a favorable direction.


Sandra’s SEFI 2025 paper complemented papers we’ve published and presented at earlier conferences, including:

You can learn more about Sandra’s work in a blog SEFI posted in 2023:

Soon, you’ll be able to read Sandra’s final thesis and learn about the impressive contributions she has made to the literature and to the engineering education research community.

I am honored to call Sardar Cruz Moreno a friend and colleague. I look forward to calling her “Dr” and to watching her flourish in the coming years!

Transcontinental Collaboration: Voices of Fulbright Alumni

I’d like to share recent social media posts by my colleagues/past students/friends — their perspectives on transcontinental collaboration are unique and valuable! Thanks to Mia Dukuly, Violet Maufuwe, Tarrah Beebee, and Shinya Takehara for taking the time to reflect, document, and publicly share your experiences.

Tanzania

The first three of these — Mia, Violet, and Tarrah — participated as students in a Fulbright-Hays Group Project Abroad that I led to Tanzania in 2005.

We spent five weeks in Dar es Salaam, studying alongside Tanzanian architecture students and teachers. Several of the students forged lifelong friendships (and some even marriages) with other members of our 63-person study group (25 students and teachers from the USA, 38 students and teachers from Tanzania).

I didn’t establish this blog (IrelandByChance.com) until 2012 (seven years after that trip, when I went on my own Fulbright fellowship to Ireland). Nevertheless, several of my past posts have mentioned aspects of that 2005 study abroad program:

Mia and Tara are two USA-based Fulbright alumnae who keep returning to East Africa — and sharing their adventures with others.

Here’s a taste of what Mia and her architect friend Violet Mafuwe have gotten up to recently:

A post shared by Mia Dukuly this past autumn.

Violet was one of the Tanzanian students participating in the 2005 study abroad program, and the only female among dozens of males.

The sisterly bond between these architects, Mia and Violet, is truly heartwarming.

Tarrah, Mia, and Violet are all actively engaged in social missions, continually reaching out and helping others, particularly vulnerable people in East Africa.

Tarrah Beebe‘s recent blog post about work in Tanzania is well worth a read: https://rafikireturns2026.blogspot.com/2026/02/asante-same-couple-days-in-same-tanzania.html

In this screenshot, Tara describes how she connects her teaching, architectural design, and outreach activities.

In fact, it was Tarrah’s February 3rd blog post that inspired me to share the treasure trove below. Tara is an architect living in Los Angeles.

Tarrah mentioned me at the top of the blog, and it means a lot to me that I helped enable and inspire her to stay involved in Tanzania. She’s been helping build an educational complex for many years.

In this screenshot, Tara provides information on the educational facility.

Japan

Like me, Tarrah also visited Japan. You can read all about her Japanese adventures here: https://tarrahinjapan.blogspot.com/

Which brings me to the other recent post I’d like to share. Shinya Takehara isn’t a Fulbright fellow (yet!), but I feel I wouldn’t have met him without the entry I got into engineering education research as a Fulbright Fellow in Ireland.

Shinya‘s recent LinkedIn post summarizes the visit Sarah Junaid and I made to Japan in January 2026 (https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/building-international-dialogue-engineering-ethics-from-takehara-517vc/?trackingId=Ky2esIgHcl0VweGzp4rMTA%3D%3D). Because I don’t have a link for people outside LinkedIn to access the content, I’ll share screenshots of Shinya’s description below.

I am deeply indebted to each of these wonderful people — Shinya, Tarrah, Mia, and Violet — for making my life brighter and more meaningful, and for always reaching out to help others and spread the ethics of care.

I also thank Shinya, Tarrah, and Mia for giving me permission to share their posts here. Sending that request brought more good news, as Mia has recently secured a new job and will be relocating with her family to Germany soon. She reports good progress with her Architecture Registration Examination — a grueling multi-part test that takes most of us years to complete. I am so excited to learn of her progress!

Join SEFI@work: What Makes Research Papers Stand Out?

Sandra Cruz Moreno and I will be featured in a SEFI@work online workshop on Wednesday, 11 February 2026 13:00 PM – 14:00 PM CET.

The title is: What makes research papers stand out? Insights from SEFI 2025’s Best Research Paper

Sandra and I are hard at work preparing meaningful content about Sandra’s award-winning SEFI paper, which reports one part of her overall PhD thesis/dissertation work.

You can read Sandra’s paper, which SEFI awarded ‘Best Research Paper’ for 2025, here: Evolving gender dynamics in teamwork experiences among female engineering students in PBL settings

Visit this SEFI webpage to register: https://www.sefi.be/2026/01/14/sefiwork-what-makes-research-papers-stand-out-insights-from-sefi-2025s-best-research-paper/

SEFI’s advert for the upcoming event.

I am delighted to discover that about 80 people have registered so far, representing a wide diversity of organizations:

Many thanks to the SEFI Education Research Methods special interest group co-chairs, Dr. Tinne De Laet and Dr. Esther Ventura-Medina, for the invitation to deliver this session, which they will moderate. Thanks also to the SEFI Office, especially Alex Gliga and Klara Ferdova, for their support in organizing and hosting this event.

This photo of Sandra and Shannon in Portugal captures the tone of our upcoming presentation.

Collaboration in Engineering Ethics: A Journey in Japan

I had the immense honor of visiting Japan as a guest of the Japanese Society of Engineering Education, 6-16 January 2026.

This trip focused on engineering ethics, how it is conceptualized and taught, and how this differs between Eastern and Western cultures.

The purpose of the trip was to advance collaboration between Japan and Europe, expand professional networks, and better understand and ultimately improve how engineering ethics is described and taught to students.

The trip was significant because language differences, travel distances, and past cultural isolation mean there is still much to learn from each other.

For this ten-day trip around Japan, I represented the European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI) — to help build bridges connecting Japan, Europe, and the global engineering ethics education and engineering education research communities.

This blog post contains loads of detail and possibly a hundred photos. I felt it was important to document the activities for posterity and to help build greater cultural understanding.

This was only my second ever trip to Asia (the first being a 1999 conference in Seoul, South Korea).

On this trip, I met so many amazing people.

I want a chance to thank each of them and let them know how much the time together meant to me. Many of them are pictured below (from the main conference, which I’ll tell you more about below).

I have summarized the profound set of cultural and professional experiences as best I can.

The participants of the main conference on engineering ethics education in Japan, from JSEE, with Sarah Junaid and Shannon Chance from SEFI.

I traveled alongside Dr. Sarah Junaid, a Reader in Biomedical Engineering at Aston University (Birmingham, UK). Sarah has travelled to Japan several times before, most recently as a Churchill Fellow, collecting data on engineering ethics education.

Sarah was also the lead author of a chapter of The Routledge International Handbook of Engineering Ethics Education, which I co-edited.

Her handbook chapter, a Contextual mapping of ethics education and accreditation nationally and internationally, included co-authors José Fernando Jiménez Mejía, Kenichi Natsume, Madeline Polmear, and Yann Serreau.

Sarah has cultivated a transcontinental team of academics who are researching the words used to describe ethics in engineering accreditation documents worldwide. This project has captivated me since I attended a paper presentation Sarah gave at the SEFI conference in Barcelona in September 2022.

Sarah’s efforts mirrored the focus on collaborative transcontinental capacity-building that I also cultivated as Chair of the global Research in Engineering Education Network (REEN).

Sarah served as a positive role model for me as I worked with the ethics handbook’s editorial team. When I explained this at the JSEE conference, I choked up; I don’t think I’d ever told Sarah how central she is to my worldview today.

I made this map to show where the authors of our handbook have lived and/or worked. You can see we had some representation from Japan (Kenichi Natsumi and Fumihiko Tochinai), but could benefit from more collaboration in Asia and also across the global south.

In all. the presentations I delivered in Japan all emphasized the power of collaboration in enhancing the delivery of engineering education and our collective approaches to understanding, defining, learning, assessing, regulating, and expanding ethics.

I define engineering ethics as professional codes, laws, theories, and frameworks, as well as social and environmental sustainability, including equity, diversity, and inclusion, that underpin engineering practice and guide what we are and want to become.

It’s about making the best better, a motto I bring with me from my formative years in 4-H, empowered by life-long, hands-on, self-directed learning. I first dreamed of travelling to Japan through 4-H, but that never came to pass. Today, my work as an academic in engineering education research finally brought me to this exotic land.

Our Hosts

Sarah and I were invited to Japan by Shinya Takehara (who attended the SEFI Ethics Symposium that I hosted in Dún Laoghaire, Ireland, in March 2025) and his colleagues, Dr. Atsushi Fujiki and Dr. Tamami Fukushi.

This team hosted us on behalf of the Committee for Investigation and Research of Engineering Ethics of JSEE; they were exceptional hosts during our visit.

A grant from the Kansai University Fund for Supporting the Formation of Strategic Research Centers, which Atsushi holds, funded our travel.

Shinya and Atsushi have collaborated on many projects, including the Development and Evaluation of Monozukurinri: A Card Game for Engineering Ethics EducationEnhancing Engineering Ethics Education through Game-Based Learning: A Case Study on Middle School Implementation, and the practices and evaluation of playing and making educational games in engineering ethics education.

We hope to work together in the future, also collaborating with Mary Nolan from ATU Sligo, on educational games and the ethics of care.

Atsushi works in the College of Engineering Department of Engineering Science and Mechanics at Shibaura Institute of Technology and runs a laboratory where “students can deepen their consideration of ethical, legal, and social issues (ELSI) associated with the development of science and technology, mainly from the humanities and social sciences, such as applied ethics, philosophy of technology, and social theories of science and technology.”

Arriving in Japan

Flying into Japan from Europe, Sarah and I landed in Osaka.

We met Shinya and Atsushi at the airport for a brief orientation, then took the train into Osaka for two nights, and onward via bullet train to Tokyo. Atsushi made sure we understood our way around and how to get food.

We used the first day to adjust to the dramatic time zone change and to explore Osaka a bit.

Headline Event at the Cocoon Tower

We got oriented for our first major activity of the week, an international workshop at Cocoon Tower, where Tokyo Online University operates. Our host, Tamami, teaches there.

As an architect, I immediately recognized this building. It is quite famous and boy is it architecturally striking.

Tamami met us and gave us a tour of the building the night before the workshop.

Following the tour, I enjoyed a lovely pre-conference dinner at a Turkish restaurant alongside Tamami, Dr. Asami Ogura (of the National Institute of Technology, KOSEN, branch in Hiroshima), Shinya, STefané, Sarah, Dr. Jun Fudano (whom I met last February in Virginia at the Association for Practical and Applied Ethics conference, as he helps lead APPE), and Misaki (a graduate of University College London’s Institute of Education, who helped translate several of our sessions) who took the photo below.

Preconference dinner with Tamami, Asami, Shinya, Stefané, Sarah, me, and Jun.

Sarah and I arrived at Cocoon Tower plenty early the next day and had breakfast near the venue. Eating so much for breakfast was a mistake with a big lunch on the horizon, but I didn’t want to risk being underprepared.

This was a spectacular event! So engaging. So well organized and translated.

The event included many interesting speakers and was well attended, with roughly two dozen colleagues travelling from all corners of Japan to participate.

The event opened with a welcome from Shinya, followed by a keynote I delivered and a Memorial Lecture delivered by Sarah.

Atsushi’s grant paid for two professional translators, which made a world of difference in the quality and comfort of our day. We each had a headset so we could hear in real time what anyone in the other language was saying.

Translators hard at work!

This was an enormous support for effective communication — it represented a substantial investment but was essential to helping us understand and engage with each other in deeply meaningful ways.

First up was my own keynote, a half-hour presentation summarizing topics that Tom Børsen and I presented at the SEFI conference last September. I helped the audience understand what SEFI is doing in engineering ethics education and invited our Japanese colleagues to join our SEFI Ethics projects and activities.

In the talk, I advocated for a shift from individual rule-following toward collective global responsibility and an “Ethics of Care” for the planet and future generations. I introduced some useful frameworks for navigating complex, high-stakes socio-technical challenges, including humble, reflexive dialogue and inclusive, culturally appropriate assessment models.

I also honored the legacy of Japanese scholar Prof. Kenichi Natsume, calling on the international community to collaboratively integrate ethics into teaching to shape a more socially responsible future.

The next talk, the Memorial Lecture, presented by Sarah Junaid, paid tribute to Kenichi. He was a co-author on Sarah’s chapter of the engineering ethics handbook. The editors of the handbook dedicated it to Kenichi, in honor of the groundbreaking work he did bridging eastern and western perspectives on engineering ethics.

Sarah discussed the ongoing relevance of Kenichi’s contributions, particularly his book on Japan’s Engineering Ethics and Western Culture.

Sarah summarized Japan’s context as steeped in collective consciousness, a duty to others, and an embedded morality. The education system there has historically focused on ethics and morality in an intrinsic, embedded way, with a strong awareness and regard for others and loyalty to the group. There have been recent shifts to increase the focus on individual responsibility.

In contrast, Sarah described Western cultures as emphasizing individuality, liberalization, and challenges of social responsibility. Education has typically focused on capitalism and free markets, economies built on growth, individuality, and liberalization. Recently, there has been increased focus on social and collective responsibility, which was a major theme of my keynote as well.

“Global collaboration is needed,” Sarah asserted, “for shaping ethical engineers and global citizens.” During Sarah’s presentation, we learned that Kenichi was central in helping Sarah collect data at KOSEN institutes across Japan during her Churchill Fellowship, and the slides in her talk showed the two of them actively collaborating. Sarah and Kenichi exemplified the type of collaboration that is desperately needed.

Shinya noted that “together, we shared our commitment to carrying forward [Kenichi’s] legacy and reaffirmed the importance of sustained dialogue between JSEE and SEFI on engineering ethics education.”

Following our talks, the first featured speaker from JSEE, Dr. Muraran Yasui (Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Osaka University), discussed how engineering ethics is taught in Japan and how it aligns with global accreditation standards.

His group studies how this is done at many postsecondary institutions in Japan. He described Japanese efforts to foster “aspirational ethics” rather than just preventive ethics among future engineers. This concerns what engineers ought to do, not just what they are legally and professionally obligated to do.

This is exactly the kind of thing discussed in the AJEE article I co-wrote, titled Above and Beyond: Ethics and Responsibility in Civil Engineering, so I was all ears to hear their ideas.

Next, Dr. Asami Ogura told us about KOSEN (the National Institute of Technology, with 51 colleges across Japan that teach students aged 15-20). Asami discussed how ethics is taught currently at KOSEN and how she believes that technology transfer can foster peace.

She also explained that KOSEN established a model core curriculum for ethics in 2018, identifying minimum competencies and learning outcomes, and providing guidance to teachers.

Asami’s work focuses on the overlap between environmental conservation, international understanding, and peacebuilding.

Third among the JSEE experts, Dr. Naoki Taoka discussed corporate engineering ethics. He is a leader in the Institution of Professional Engineers in Japan and a visiting professor at Hiroshima University.

Naoki explained that the Institute’s main business is “to raise awareness of ethics among professional engineers and engineers,” as well as to improve their qualifications, promote and spread awareness of the professionalization system, develop technical talent, and contribute socially through activities.

Following the three JSEE presentations, Dr. Yukito (Happyman) Kobayasi and Atsushi also provided overview comments and insights.

Sarah and I were listening attentively to it all and making detailed notes, as we’d been asked to respond to Tamami’s questions from our European perspective.

We also provided feedback on the other speakers’ presentations, and then addressed questions from the very engaged audience.

Social Side of Events at Cocoon Tower

Overall, this was a very exciting day. Participants came from all over Japan, the event was held at the architecturally famous “Cocoon Tower”, and before the event, Sarah and I got to meet and enjoy lunch with the late Professor Kenichi Natsumi’s wife, Misaki Natsume, and son. We enjoyed a delicious ramen-type lunch with Misaki, Shinya, Atsushi, and some of the experts named above.

We also got to exchange gifts with Misaki and her son. She gave us the most sincere, heartwarming, handwritten notes describing, among other things, how much being part of the handbook project had meant to her husband.

Dr. Fumihiko Tochinai also attended the event. He co-authored Chapter 30 of the ethics handbook, titled “Two criticisms of engineering ethics assessment,” with Rockwell Clancy, Xin Luo, and Chunping Fan.

At the end of the event, we got a “family picture” and then headed off for a traditional Japanese meal together. It was a very special experience, and I learned some important cultural aspects (when and where to wear slippers versus socks only inside, how to pour beer for each other, and the like). One of the day’s attendees, Jeffrey S. Cross, an expat from the USA like me, helped me translate and explain nuances.

Cultural Explorations

Following this big day of activity, Sarah and I, along with Sarah’s lovely newlywed husband, Stefané, who joined her for the trip, had a bit of time to explore Tokyo. We enjoyed exploring a huge electronics store together.

On our last morning in Tokyo, I visited the Shinjuku Goyen National Garden, where at the tea house, I bumped into Asami and a friend of hers.

Small-Scale Working Session

After I explored the greenhouses at the Garden, Sarah, Stefané, and I headed back to Osaka, where the following day we participated in a small-scale workshop to plan engineering ethics education activities for the future. The workshop was held at Kansai University’s Umeda Campus.

Mari Ito joined us as a language expert to help translate ideas between English and Japanese. She had also translated many of the written materials and slides for the full sequence of events during our trip.

The whole group at the end of our working session.

I really enjoyed the presentation that Dr. Shinya Oya delivered and the discussion of projects underway or envisioned in Japan where Sarah and I might be able to connect, ourselves and/or alongside our colleagues from Europe. “In this intimate setting,” Shinya explained, “we were able to deepen discussions on how future joint research might be shaped, building on insights from the Tokyo workshop.”

We all went out for Italian tapas together after the workshop. We each selected a couple of items from the menu and got a chance to taste a wide variety of foods. The presentation was beautiful!

Visiting KOSAN Nara Campus

Leaving Osaka the next day, we headed to Nara to visit a branch of the Institute of Technology (KOSEN), where Shinya teaches. Sarah and I travelled with Shinya to his campus.

The walk from the train station to the campus was really beautiful. The town where the campus sits is a ‘castle town,’ still organized around the canal that looped the site and still with a castle on the hill.

We had the immense honor of meeting Dr. Shinae Kizaka-Kondoh, a medical doctor and currently the Principal (president) of Nara National College of Technology.

She is also the Vice President of the Japan Network of Women Engineers and Scientists (JNWES).

Shinya Takehara with his university leader.

Shinae is a Japanese researcher, professor, and administrator known for her work in molecular imaging and tumor hypoxia, as well as her advocacy for women in STEM. She has published research on the challenges and solutions regarding the gender gap in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) in Japan.

Tea with Dr. Shinae Kizaka-Kondoh

Shinae, Sarah, and I delivered talks to a class of about 40 Chemical Engineering students at KOSEN. The class is taught by Ryoko Uda. Chiyako Araya also spoke; she has done interesting research to quantitatively evaluate generic skills in active learning. She was also an important contributor to the event at the Cocoon Tower.

During the class, we discussed gender and diversity related to engineering ethics and engineering education research.

Chiyako discussed SHINAYAKA Engineer Educational Program”, learning from people in different fields to expand the potential of female engineers.

Shinae’s talk incorporated elements of her paper Gender Equality in STEM and Other Male-Dominated Fields in Belgium and Japan.

Sarah presented research on gender aspects developed by a student she supervised.

At the end of the class session, I had the opportunity to speak about the broader role of engineering education research. I also shared some of the research that Sandra Cruz Moreno and I have done together.

I presented our work in engineering education research to understand students’ experiences and assess how effectively students learn various engineering topics depending on how the content is delivered.

Touring Tanpopo, A Community of Disabled Artists

Leaving KOSAN, we (Shinya, Sarah, and I) stopped in at Tanpopo, a community center where disabled artists work and live.

Artists there produced Shinya’s engineering ethics card game, which we hope to translate into English soon.

At Tanpopo, staff members Gian Miki and Masashi Yamano showed us around and explained how things work.

I bought two lovely scarves woven by members of the community. Proceeds go to the artists themselves, and the artist of one of the scarves I bought was there at the time. She expressed such pride and joy!

Visiting Yakushiji Temple

Then, Sarah and I had the chance to visit Yakushiji Temple, a UNESCO World Heritage Site.

This temple is of Chinese design, and artisans from China helped construct it. It was eye-opening to me how much exchange my colleagues described having with other Asian countries. Their politicians may not seem to collaborate, but their academics certainly do!

Earlier on this day, at KOSAN, I met a student who won an international competition in Chemical Engineering. The competition was held in the Middle East, but he said Vietnam and (I think) India were major competitors.

Dinner and Accomodations Celebraitng Japanese Traditions

The evening after this event, we joined with Shinae, Chiyako, Mari Ito, Ryoko Una, Atsushi, Shinya, and his wife and daughters for a very special meal at ‘bird bird.’ The owner/head chef is an architect, and he runs this restaurant in addition to having restored the accommodation where we stayed.

Overall, bird bird (@birdbird_nara), operates as a community space offering coworking, a shared office, dining, and a rooftop sauna. It was created by architect Shunpei Fujioka and is located on the same block as the housing complex or ‘hotel’ where we stayed. We booked the place on Booking.com at Tamami and Shinya’s recommendation.

The dinner group made lovely cards for Sarah and me without us even suspecting. It was a project led by Shinya’s daughters, who also made many origami gifts for us. I saw the architect/chef, Shunpei Fujioka, helping with that!

A lovely card to memorialize our time together.

A major highlight of our visit to Japan was staying for three nights in a traditional Japanese house, part of a set of five adjacent homes that this architect has lovingly restored.

I have read about traditional Japanese houses and visited similar (Korean) ones in folk museums, but living in one for three days was an immense honor.

Overall, the bathing rituals were a highlight of my private time in Japan. The hotel in Tokyo had a public bath in the basement, which was an experience like no other. I love Turkish hammams (and even visited one in Malta over the Christmas holiday).

The traditional Japanese house also offered a unique and exquisite bathing experience.

But the most unexpected pleasure was that all but one of the toilet seats I used in Japan were heated and had a bidet function. The joy of a warm bum cannot be overstated.

Cultural Immersion with Collegial Friends

It was a privilege to get deeply acquainted with Shinya, Atsushi, Tamami, and all their colleagues.

For me, it was also a unique honor to travel with Sarah and Stefané; they treated me as family and never let me feel like a third wheel. Sarah skillfully guided Stefané and me through complex networks of trains, streets, alleyways, shops, and restaurants.

We visited a mosque at the Turkish Cultural Center in Tokyo, an experience I thoroughly enjoyed. We even had a meal at the mosque, prepared by the community for the worshippers.

We also visited a museum with Japanese artifacts, located in a shopping center, presented in collaboration with a university, and located right beside the main train station in Tokyo.

Heading Home

I look forward to seeing you again soon and to working together to deliver workshops, translate games, test them with Western audiences, and collaborate on projects and research articles.